Microsoft takes aim at IBM in Web campaign
Microsoft will take aim at IBM Thursday in a Web campaign touting Windows Server on Intel-based hardware as a better, more economical performer than IBM's AIX and RISC server platform.
Key to the effort will be data derived from Microsoft-conducted tests that the company said show Windows Server 2008 on Intel-based HP blade servers outperforming an IBM Power server with Power processors and IBM's AIX Unix OS. The application used in the testing was an IBM stock trader application. Also used in the tests was IBM's WebSphere application server. Windows also outperformed IBM when the application was written as a Microsoft .Net application, according to Microsoft.
[ Server faceoff: Windows versus Linux. ]
"We find that there's lots of customers that are running WebSphere and we want to have a simple message for them: that they can save significant money on hardware and increase their performance by running WebSphere on Windows," said Steven Martin, senior director of product management for the developer platform at Microsoft.
Microsoft will feature its data on a Web site to be called www.websphereloveswindows.com, in a campaign entitled, "Who Knew?" A white paper documenting test configurations will be featured as will a capacity planning tool and information on mainframe migrations.
IBM could not be reached for comment on Microsoft's claims when contacted late on Wednesday afternoon.
InfoWorld
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
microsoft
Powered by Twitter
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













